Blog Articles 126–130
Published on Saturday, February 2, 2013 and tagged with
immigration.
Over here in the department of punditry, we deal with a lot of hard
issues, ones on which the evidence is mixed and the options are all bad.
But the immigration issue is a blessed relief. On immigration, the
evidence is overwhelming; the best way forward is clear.
The forlorn pundit doesn’t even have to make the humanitarian case
that immigration reform would be a great victory for human dignity. The
cold economic case by itself is so strong.
— The
Easy Problem — David Brooks on the urgent, and blindingly obvious,
need for immigration reform.
Published on Sunday, January 27, 2013 and tagged with
immigration.
But the United States ran an open borders regime throughout the 19th
century and we weren’t worse off for it. On the contrary, it laid the
foundations for American greatness. Shifting back in that direction—with
exceptions for dangerous criminals and other select problem types—over
time seems perfectly feasible to me and would substantially increase
overall human welfare. Now obviously that doesn’t resolve the question
of whether or not, morally speaking, it makes sense to simply not care
about the interests of foreigners. But Kaus and I agree that
foreign-born people are people, so for my part I’d like to take their
interests into consideration.
— What
Would Happen If We Let All The Immigrants In — Yglesias argues,
rightly, that discussion of U.S. immigration policy should not disregard
the interests of those who don’t happen to be born in the U.S.
Published on Wednesday, January 23, 2013 and tagged with
economics.
I’ve greatly enjoyed (if that word can really be applied here)
reading Timothy
Noah’s extensive exploration of US income inequality. In this
10-article series, he explores explores a variety of factors that might
explain the growing income inequality in the U.S. over the last
half-century (called the ‘Great Divergence’), and what the likely
contributing factors actually are.
If you aren’t convinced that this is imporant, read the last
installment. Then go back and read the whole thing. The 9th
part contains a bullet-point summary of the various candidate causes
and how much they likely contribute to the issue.
One unfortunate caveat to this series is that it very much has a
“take my word for it” flavor when it comes to why we should believe the
scholars Noah favors vs. competing analyses of the theories in play.
It’s still very much worth reading.
The whole thing is also available as a single
PDF.
Published on Tuesday, January 22, 2013 and tagged with
immigration.
Mr. Dominguez’s illegal detention and deportation are the direct and
foreseeable consequence of official policies, patterns, practices, and
customs that manifest not only intentional discrimination based on race
and ethnicity and a failure to recognize basic principles of due
process, but also a reckless disregard for human life and liberty.
Although the U.S. government has long been aware that its failure to
implement due process protections in its immigration detention and
removal procedures results in unjust detention, unfair hearings and
illegal deportations, neither the Department of Justice nor the
Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
have rectified the shortcomings in their procedures and policies,
leaving U.S. citizens like Mr. Dominguez vulnerable to erroneous
apprehension, detention and deportation.
— Lawsuit
filed over a Massachusetts native’s unlawful 10-year deportation
Published on Monday, January 21, 2013 and tagged with
justice.
The
Power of the Prosecutor, in the Huffington Post, is probably the
most important thing I’ve read in the aftermath of Aaron Swartz’s
suicide. Radley Balko describes carefully and thoroughly the extent of
corruption in the way criminal “justice” currently works in America,
starting not with the prosecutors themselves but with legislation: we
have too many laws to ensnare the unwary or unorthodox citizen. And it
goes downhill from there. If you read nothing else on Swartz, read
that.
Swartz’s own article “Fix the machine, not the
person” from late last year is also very worthwhile. Swartz was a
dedicated activist, and understood keenly that anger towards individual
people in the system is entirely ineffective when it comes to tearing
down systemic injustice.