Where are the People?
“Where are the People? Political, Ethical, and Humanist Foundations for Recommendation and Information Discovery”, given at Jheronimus Academy of Data Science in Den Bosch, NL on September 9, 2026.
- 🌅 Abstract
- 🧑🏻🏫 Slides
- 📖 Bibliography
Abstract
Recommender systems, search engines, and other modern information discovery and access technologies have broadened both access to information and the ability to disseminate new information. In this talk, I take up the question of why we develop and deploy such technologies: when we build a recommender system, what purpose(s) do we intend it to serve?. As information, entertainment, and technologies for discovering them have profound impact on both individual people and the societies they shape and inhabit, clearly defining the goals of such systems is necessary to properly evaluate them and to ensure that they promote healthy, well-informed, and democratic societies.
I will discuss several different and possibly-conflicting goals that may be set for an information discovery system; how those may support or oppose broader economic, political, ethical, or social objectives and principles; and how specific goals affect the evaluation of the effectiveness, behavior, and impacts of information access systems.
Slides
Bibliography
Papers Discussed
, , , , , and . 2026. Recommending With, Not For: Co-Designing Recommender Systems for Social Good. Transactions on Recommender Systems 5(1) (August 2026; online Aug 5, 2025), 3:1–24. Selected for presentation at RecSys 2026. DOI 10.1145/3759261. arXiv:2508.03792 [cs.HC]. Cited 19 times.
, , , and . 2022. Fairness in Information Access Systems. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 16(1–2) (July 2022), 1–177. DOI 10.1561/1500000079. arXiv:2105.05779 [cs.IR]. NSF PAR 10347630. Impact factor: 8. Cited 311 times. Cited 108 times.
, , , and . 2024. Not Just Algorithms: Strategically Addressing Consumer Impacts in Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 46th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR ’24, IR for Good track), Mar 24–28, 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 14611:314–335. DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_25. NSF PAR 10497110. Acceptance rate: 35.9%. Cited 22 times. Cited 6 times.
, , and . 2023. Seeking Information with a ‘More Knowledgeable Other’. ACM Interactions 30(1) (January 2023), 70–73. DOI 10.1145/3573364. Cited 11 times. Cited 4 times.
Works Cited
- ACM Code of Ethics.
- IFLA Code of Ethics for Librarians and other Information Workers.
- Anderson, C. 2009. The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more. Random House.
- Lawrence, E E. 2020. “On the Problem of Oppressive Tastes in the Public Library.” Journal of Documentation 76 (5): 1091–1107. doi:10.1108/JD-01-2020-0002.
- Belkin, N J, and S E Robertson. 1976. “Some Ethical and Political Implications of Theoretical Research in Information Science.” In Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255563562.
- Burke, Robin, and Morgan Sylvester. 2024. “Post-Userist Recommender Systems: A Manifesto.” <arXiv:2410.11870>.
- World Day of Peace message from Pope Francis.
- Māori Data Sovereignty Principles from Te Mana Raraunga.
- Franklin, Ursula M. 2004. The Real World of Technology. Revised Edition. CBC Massey Lectures. Toronto, Ont.; Berkeley, CA: House of Anansi Press. http://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/the-1989-cbc-massey-lectures-the-real-world-of-technology-1.2946845.
- Gaskell, Elizabeth. 1854. North and South. Chapman & Hall.
- Dirk Bollen, Bart Knijnenburg, Martijn Willemsen, and Mark Graus. 2010. “Understanding Choice Overload in Recommender Systems.” RecSys ’10. doi:10.1145/1864708.1864724.
- Thomas Jefferson. 1789. Letter to Richard Price. January 8, 1789. (text
- Shira Mitchell, Eric Potash, Solon Barocas, Alexander D’Amour, and Kristian Lum. 2020. “Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions.” Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 8 (November). doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902.